Visible to Intel only — GUID: pfc1689287276352
Ixiasoft
Visible to Intel only — GUID: pfc1689287276352
Ixiasoft
3.6.2. General Guidelines for GTS Transceiver Ethernet Interface
- Intra pair skew: ±1mil
BGA Breakout Optimization
Through hole vias with backdrill are used. As outlined in the General Design Considerations section, note the change of impedance control tolerance, total insertion loss and so forth for microstrip routing. Altera recommends to use a 3D simulation for optimization the BGA breakout. Try to make return loss lower than -15 dB at Nyquist frequency (lower than -20 dB is better) and control the impedance changing of cut-out area as small as possible (better within ±5 ohm). The following figures show detailed structures used on SOM for top layer and L3 fan-out. The following figures show the simulation results of return loss and TDR where the drill hole size of 8 mils and pad size of 16 mils is used. Simulation results for 18 mils pad size have been also presented. Both pad sizes can get good performance.
The following figure (left) shows simulation results for 18 mils pad with the same cut-out size as 16 mils pad. The impedance is lower due to large capacitance caused by larger pad size, and the return loss is approximately 3 to 4 dB higher, however still meeting -15 dB requirement. A larger anti-pad size, such as 28 mils, can improve return loss performance as shown in the following figure (right).
The following figure shows L5 breakout structure, where there is no L5 breakout on SOM. This is for simulation study reference.