Visible to Intel only — GUID: uhy1689287256508
Ixiasoft
Visible to Intel only — GUID: uhy1689287256508
Ixiasoft
3.5.2. General Guidelines for GTS Transceiver PCIe* Gen4 Interface
- Intra pair skew: ±1mil
BGA Breakout Optimization
Through hole vias with backdrill are used. As outlined in the General Design Considerations section, note the change of impedance control tolerance, total insertion loss and so forth for microstrip routing. Altera recommends 3D field solver simulation for BGA breakout optimization. Try to make return loss lower than -15 dB at Nyquist frequency (lower than -20 dB is better) and control the impedance changing of cut-out area as small as possible (better within ±5 ohm). The following figures show detailed structures used on SOM for top layer and L3 fan-out. The following figures show the simulation results of return loss and TDR where the drill hole size of 8 mils and pad size of 16 mils is used. Simulation results for 18 mils pad size have been also presented. Both pad sizes can get good performance.
The impedance is lower due to the large capacitance caused by larger pad size of 18 mils. While the return loss is 3 to 4 dB higher, it meets the -15 dB requirement. A larger anti-pad size such as 30 mils can improve return loss performance as shown in the Simulation Results of L3 Breakout Using 18 mils Pad Size figure.