PCB High-Speed Signal Design Guidelines: Agilex™ 5 FPGAs and SoCs

ID 821801
Date 11/18/2024
Public
Document Table of Contents

3.5.2. General Guidelines for GTS Transceiver PCIe* Gen4 Interface

  • Intra pair skew: ±1mil

BGA Breakout Optimization

Through hole vias with backdrill are used. As outlined in the General Design Considerations section, note the change of impedance control tolerance, total insertion loss and so forth for microstrip routing. Altera recommends 3D field solver simulation for BGA breakout optimization. Try to make return loss lower than -15 dB at Nyquist frequency (lower than -20 dB is better) and control the impedance changing of cut-out area as small as possible (better within ±5 ohm). The following figures show detailed structures used on SOM for top layer and L3 fan-out. The following figures show the simulation results of return loss and TDR where the drill hole size of 8 mils and pad size of 16 mils is used. Simulation results for 18 mils pad size have been also presented. Both pad sizes can get good performance.

Figure 24. 85 Ω Top Layer Breakout Structure
Figure 25. 85 Ω L3 Breakout Structure
Figure 26. Simulation Results of Return Loss Using 16 mils Pad SizeFor top layer breakout (left) and L3 breakout (right).
Figure 27. Simulation Results of TDR Using 16 mils Pad SizeFor top layer breakout (left) and L3 breakout (right).

The impedance is lower due to the large capacitance caused by larger pad size of 18 mils. While the return loss is 3 to 4 dB higher, it meets the -15 dB requirement. A larger anti-pad size such as 30 mils can improve return loss performance as shown in the Simulation Results of L3 Breakout Using 18 mils Pad Size figure.

Figure 28. Simulation Results of L3 Breakout Using 18 mils Pad SizeUsing the same cut-out size (left) and larger anti-pad with 30 mils diameter (right).