AN 1003: Multi Memory IP System Resource Planning: for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs

Download PDF
ID 788295
Date 11/22/2023
Public
Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. Answers to Top FAQs 2. About This Application Note 3. Component Bandwidth Projections and Limitations 4. Resource Planning for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs 5. Factors Affecting NoC Performance 6. Debugging the NoC 7. Document Revision History of AN 1003: Multi Memory IP System Resource Planning for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs
2. About This Application Note x
2.1. Preliminary Guidelines 2.2. Document Prerequisites 2.3. Terminology for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs
3. Component Bandwidth Projections and Limitations x
3.1. Memory Controller Efficiency 3.2. Hard Memory NoC Bandwidth 3.3. Overall Bandwidth for NoC Systems
3.1. Memory Controller Efficiency x
3.1.1. HBM2E UIB Controller Efficiency 3.1.2. External Memory Interface Controller Efficiency
3.2. Hard Memory NoC Bandwidth x
3.2.1. Horizontal NoC Bandwidth 3.2.2. Initiator NoC Bandwidth 3.2.3. Target NoC Bandwidth 3.2.4. Initiator Target Link Bandwidth
4. Resource Planning for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs x
4.1. Hard Memory NoC Resource Planning Overview 4.2. I/O Bank Blockage 4.3. Planning Avalon® Streaming Utilization 4.4. Planning for Initiator Blockage Impact from GPIO, LVDS SERDES, and PHY Lite Bypass Mode 4.5. Planning NoC PLL and I/O PLL 4.6. Pin Planning for HPS EMIF 4.7. Planning for an External Memory Interface 4.8. Planning for HBM2E 4.9. Planning for the Fabric NoC 4.10. Planning for AXI4-Lite 4.11. Planning NoC and Memory Solution Clocks
4.2. I/O Bank Blockage x
4.2.1. Top Hard Memory NoC 4.2.2. Bottom Hard Memory NoC
4.10. Planning for AXI4-Lite x
4.10.1. Single AXI4 Lite Initiator for Each Horizontal NoC 4.10.2. AXI4-Lite Initiator for HBM2E 4.10.3. AXI4-Lite Initiator for EMIF
4.11. Planning NoC and Memory Solution Clocks x
4.11.1. Clocking without the Fabric NoC 4.11.2. Clocking with the Fabric NoC
5. Factors Affecting NoC Performance x
5.1. Recommended Performance Tuning Procedure 5.2. NoC Initiator and Target Clock Rate 5.3. Recommended NoC Design Topologies 5.4. Traffic Access Pattern and Memory Controller Efficiency 5.5. Traffic Access Pattern Due To Multiple Traffic Flows 5.6. Transaction Size 5.7. Congestion Interaction 5.8. Bandwidth Sharing At Each Switch 5.9. Exceeding NoC Bandwidth Limits 5.10. Maximum Number of Outstanding Transactions 5.11. QoS Priority 5.12. AxID 5.13. Example: 2x2 HBM Crossbars 5.14. Example: 16x16 Crossbar
5.3. Recommended NoC Design Topologies x
5.3.1. 1:1 Connectivity with EMIF and HBM 5.3.2. HBM Crossbars 5.3.3. Connectivity with HPS
6. Debugging the NoC x
6.1. Debugging NoC AXI Transaction Issues 6.2. Debugging NoC Bit Errors 6.3. Debugging NoC Performance Issues
6.3. Debugging NoC Performance Issues x
6.3.1. Measuring Performance with the Signal Tap Logic Analyzer 6.3.2. Measuring Performance with the Performance Monitor 6.3.3. Performance Debug Steps
1. Answers to Top FAQs
2. About This Application Note
3. Component Bandwidth Projections and Limitations
4. Resource Planning for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs
5. Factors Affecting NoC Performance
6. Debugging the NoC
7. Document Revision History of AN 1003: Multi Memory IP System Resource Planning for Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGAs

3.2.4. Initiator Target Link Bandwidth

Transactions between an initiator and target that are far apart laterally must transfer through many switches, increasing the minimum latency. Transactions on such initiator-target connections going through the same switches compete for horizontal bandwidth.

Transactions between initiators and targets that connect directly to the same switch route locally. Such transactions need not transfer horizontally along these links, resulting in the lowest latency. Therefore, the bandwidth that these local connections use does not count against the horizontal bandwidth limits.

The separate links service adjacent targets. Therefore, traffic to one target does not compete for bandwidth with traffic to an adjacent target. The combined bandwidth demand of initiator-target links in one direction (left-to-right or right-to-left) must not exceed the capacity of the link in one direction, as Horizontal NoC Ideal Bandwidth shows.

Select an option where initiator and target connect to the same switch, if possible. Although direct connection does not share horizontal bandwidth, you can still observe congestion if there are multiple initiators talking to the target. When multiple initiators talk to one target, the total bandwidth requirement is the sum of all those connections. You can observe congestion on the target if the total bandwidth requirement from multiple initiators (talking to the same target) exceeds the target supported bandwidth. If you specify a bandwidth requirement on a given target, the Intel Quartus Prime software reports whether this bandwidth can be achieved, or if there is too much congestion.

For architectural details on the various NoC segment types, refer to NoC Segments in Intel Agilex® 7 M-Series FPGA Network-on-Chip (NoC) User Guide.

If direct connect is unattainable, try maximizing the distribution of connections across different links to avoid congestion on horizontal links. If you are not using direct-connect, it is best to minimize the number of switches between the initiator and target, on every connection.

Related Information
Level Two Title