Visible to Intel only — GUID: sfo1410069784707
Ixiasoft
Visible to Intel only — GUID: sfo1410069784707
Ixiasoft
21.5.1.4. Slave-Transfer Operation for Bulk Transfers
In the standard I2C protocol, all transactions are single byte transactions and the programmer responds to a remote master read request by writing one byte into the slave's TX FIFO. When a slave (slave-transmitter) is issued with a read request (RD_REQ) from the remote master (master-receiver), at a minimum there should be at least one entry placed into the slave-transmitter's TX FIFO. The I2C controller is designed to handle more data in the TX FIFO so that subsequent read requests can receive that data without raising an interrupt to request more data. Ultimately, this eliminates the possibility of significant latencies being incurred between raising the interrupt for data each time had there been a restriction of having only one entry placed in the TX FIFO. †
This mode only occurs when I2C controller is acting as a slave-transmitter. If the remote master acknowledges the data sent by the slave-transmitter and there is no data in the slave's TX FIFO, the I2C controller raises the read request interrupt (RD_REQ) and waits for data to be written into the TX FIFO before it can be sent to the remote master. †
If the RD_REQ interrupt is masked, due to bit 5 (M_RD_REQ) of the IC_INTR_STAT register being set to 0, then it is recommended that the CPU does periodic reads of the IC_RAW_INTR_STAT register. Reads of IC_RAW_INTR_STAT that return bit 5 (R_RD_REQ) set to 1 must be treated as the equivalent of the RD_REQ interrupt referred to in this section.†
The RD_REQ interrupt is raised upon a read request, and like interrupts, must be cleared when exiting the interrupt service handling routine (ISR). The ISR allows you to either write 1 byte or more than 1 byte into the TX FIFO. During the transmission of these bytes to the master, if the master acknowledges the last byte then the slave must raise the RD_REQ again because the master is requesting for more data. †
If the programmer knows in advance that the remote master is requesting a packet of n bytes, then when another master addresses the I2C controller and requests data, the TX FIFO could be written with n number bytes and the remote master receives it as a continuous stream of data. For example, the I2C controller slave continues to send data to the remote master as long as the remote master is acknowledging the data sent and there is data available in the TX FIFO. There is no need to issue RD_REQ again. †
If the remote master is to receive n bytes from the I2C controller but the programmer wrote a number of bytes larger than n to the TX FIFO, then when the slave finishes sending the requested n bytes, it clears the TX FIFO and ignores any excess bytes. †
The I2C controller generates a transmit abort (TX_ABRT) event to indicate the clearing of the TX FIFO in this example. At the time an ACK/NACK is expected, if a NACK is received, then the remote master has all the data it wants. At this time, a flag is raised within the slave's state machine to clear the leftover data in the TX FIFO. This flag is transferred to the processor bus clock domain where the FIFO exists and the contents of the TX FIFO are cleared at that time. †