Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guide: Design Recommendations

Download PDF
ID 683082
Date 10/04/2021
Public

A newer version of this document is available. Customers should click here to go to the newest version.

Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. Recommended HDL Coding Styles 2. Recommended Design Practices 3. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software A. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guides
1. Recommended HDL Coding Styles x
1.1. Using Provided HDL Templates 1.2. Instantiating IP Cores in HDL 1.3. Inferring Multipliers and DSP Functions 1.4. Inferring Memory Functions from HDL Code 1.5. Register and Latch Coding Guidelines 1.6. General Coding Guidelines 1.7. Designing with Low-Level Primitives 1.8. Recommended HDL Coding Styles Revision History
1.1. Using Provided HDL Templates x
1.1.1. Inserting HDL Code from a Provided Template
1.3. Inferring Multipliers and DSP Functions x
1.3.1. Inferring Multipliers 1.3.2. Inferring Multiply-Accumulator and Multiply-Adder Functions
1.4. Inferring Memory Functions from HDL Code x
1.4.1. Inferring RAM functions from HDL Code 1.4.2. Inferring ROM Functions from HDL Code 1.4.3. Inferring Shift Registers in HDL Code 1.4.4. Inferring FIFOs in HDL Code
1.4.1. Inferring RAM functions from HDL Code x
1.4.1.1. Use Synchronous Memory Blocks 1.4.1.2. Avoid Unsupported Reset and Control Conditions 1.4.1.3. Check Read-During-Write Behavior 1.4.1.4. Controlling RAM Inference and Implementation 1.4.1.5. Single-Clock Synchronous RAM with Old Data Read-During-Write Behavior 1.4.1.6. Single-Clock Synchronous RAM with New Data Read-During-Write Behavior 1.4.1.7. Simple Dual-Port, Dual-Clock Synchronous RAM 1.4.1.8. True Dual-Port Synchronous RAM 1.4.1.9. Mixed-Width Dual-Port RAM 1.4.1.10. RAM with Byte-Enable Signals 1.4.1.11. Specifying Initial Memory Contents at Power-Up
1.4.3. Inferring Shift Registers in HDL Code x
1.4.3.1. Simple Shift Register 1.4.3.2. Shift Register with Evenly Spaced Taps
1.4.4. Inferring FIFOs in HDL Code x
1.4.4.1. Dual Clock FIFO Example in Verilog HDL 1.4.4.2. Dual Clock FIFO Timing Constraints
1.5. Register and Latch Coding Guidelines x
1.5.1. Register Power-Up Values 1.5.2. Secondary Register Control Signals Such as Clear and Clock Enable 1.5.3. Latches
1.5.1. Register Power-Up Values x
1.5.1.1. Specifying a Power-Up Value
1.5.3. Latches x
1.5.3.1. Avoid Unintentional Latch Generation 1.5.3.2. Inferring Latches Correctly Verilog HDL Set-Reset Latch VHDL Data Type Latch Verilog Continuous Assignment Does Not Infer Latch
1.6. General Coding Guidelines x
1.6.1. Tri-State Signals 1.6.2. Clock Multiplexing 1.6.3. Adder Trees 1.6.4. State Machine HDL Guidelines 1.6.5. Multiplexer HDL Guidelines 1.6.6. Cyclic Redundancy Check Functions 1.6.7. Comparator HDL Guidelines 1.6.8. Counter HDL Guidelines
1.6.3. Adder Trees x
1.6.3.1. Architectures with 6-Input LUTs in Adaptive Logic Modules
1.6.4. State Machine HDL Guidelines x
1.6.4.1. State Machine Power-Up 1.6.4.2. Verilog HDL State Machines 1.6.4.3. VHDL State Machines
1.6.4.2. Verilog HDL State Machines x
1.6.4.2.1. Verilog-2001 State Machine Coding Example 1.6.4.2.2. SystemVerilog State Machine Coding Example
1.6.4.3. VHDL State Machines x
1.6.4.3.1. VHDL State Machine Coding Example
1.6.5. Multiplexer HDL Guidelines x
1.6.5.1. Intel® Quartus® Prime Software Option for Multiplexer Restructuring 1.6.5.2. Multiplexer Types 1.6.5.3. Implicit Defaults in IF Statements 1.6.5.4. default or OTHERS CASE Assignment
1.6.5.2. Multiplexer Types x
1.6.5.2.1. Binary Multiplexers 1.6.5.2.2. Selector Multiplexers 1.6.5.2.3. Priority Multiplexers
1.6.6. Cyclic Redundancy Check Functions x
1.6.6.1. If Performance is Important, Optimize for Speed 1.6.6.2. Use Separate CRC Blocks Instead of Cascaded Stages 1.6.6.3. Use Separate CRC Blocks Instead of Allowing Blocks to Merge 1.6.6.4. Take Advantage of Latency if Available 1.6.6.5. Save Power by Disabling CRC Blocks When Not in Use 1.6.6.6. Initialize the Device with the Synchronous Load (sload) Signal
2. Recommended Design Practices x
2.1. Following Synchronous FPGA Design Practices 2.2. HDL Design Guidelines 2.3. Use Clock and Register-Control Architectural Features 2.4. Implementing Embedded RAM 2.5. Design Assistant Design Rule Checking 2.6. Recommended Design Practices Revision History
2.1. Following Synchronous FPGA Design Practices x
2.1.1. Implementing Synchronous Designs 2.1.2. Asynchronous Design Hazards
2.2. HDL Design Guidelines x
2.2.1. Considerations for the Intel® Hyperflex™ FPGA Architecture 2.2.2. Optimizing Combinational Logic 2.2.3. Optimizing Clocking Schemes 2.2.4. Optimizing Physical Implementation and Timing Closure 2.2.5. Optimizing Power Consumption 2.2.6. Managing Design Metastability
2.2.2. Optimizing Combinational Logic x
2.2.2.1. Avoid Combinational Loops 2.2.2.2. Avoid Unintended Latch Inference 2.2.2.3. Avoid Delay Chains in Clock Paths 2.2.2.4. Use Synchronous Pulse Generators
2.2.3. Optimizing Clocking Schemes x
2.2.3.1. Register Combinational Logic Outputs 2.2.3.2. Avoid Asynchronous Clock Division 2.2.3.3. Avoid Ripple Counters 2.2.3.4. Use Multiplexed Clocks 2.2.3.5. Use Gated Clocks 2.2.3.6. Use Synchronous Clock Enables
2.2.3.5. Use Gated Clocks x
2.2.3.5.1. Recommended Clock-Gating Methods
2.2.4. Optimizing Physical Implementation and Timing Closure x
2.2.4.1. Planning Physical Implementation 2.2.4.2. Planning FPGA Resources 2.2.4.3. Optimizing for Timing Closure 2.2.4.4. Optimizing Critical Timing Paths
2.3. Use Clock and Register-Control Architectural Features x
2.3.1. Use Global Reset Resources 2.3.2. Use Global Clock Network Resources 2.3.3. Use Clock Region Assignments to Optimize Clock Constraints 2.3.4. Avoid Asynchronous Register Control Signals
2.3.1. Use Global Reset Resources x
2.3.1.1. Use Synchronous Resets 2.3.1.2. Using Asynchronous Resets 2.3.1.3. Use Synchronized Asynchronous Reset
2.3.3. Use Clock Region Assignments to Optimize Clock Constraints x
2.3.3.1. Clock Region Assignments in Intel® Stratix® 10 Devices 2.3.3.2. Clock Region Assignments in Intel® Arria® 10 and Older Device Families
2.5. Design Assistant Design Rule Checking x
2.5.1. Setting Up Design Assistant 2.5.2. Running Design Assistant During Compilation 2.5.3. Running Design Assistant in Analysis Mode 2.5.4. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant 2.5.5. Managing Design Assistant Rules 2.5.6. Design Assistant Rule Categories
2.5.1. Setting Up Design Assistant x
2.5.1.1. Design Assistant Rule Severity Levels
2.5.2. Running Design Assistant During Compilation x
2.5.2.1. Opening Design Assistant Rule Help
2.5.3. Running Design Assistant in Analysis Mode x
2.5.3.1. Launching Design Assistant from Chip Planner 2.5.3.2. Launching Design Assistant from Timing Analyzer
2.5.4. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant x
2.5.4.1. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant to Timing Analyzer 2.5.4.2. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant to Visualization Tools
2.5.5. Managing Design Assistant Rules x
2.5.5.1. Changing the Default Number of Violations per Rule 2.5.5.2. Enabling Rules for Specific Compiler Stages 2.5.5.3. Specifying Rule Parameters for a Specific Compiler Stage 2.5.5.4. Modifying Rule Severity Levels 2.5.5.5. Waiving Design Assistant Rules 2.5.5.6. Design Assistant Tags
2.5.5.5. Waiving Design Assistant Rules x
2.5.5.5.1. Creating Design Assistant Waivers 2.5.5.5.2. Deleting Design Assistant Waivers 2.5.5.5.3. Design Assistant Waiver Tcl Commands
2.5.5.5.1. Creating Design Assistant Waivers x
2.5.5.5.1.1. Design Assistant Waiver Dialog Box
2.5.5.5.3. Design Assistant Waiver Tcl Commands x
2.5.5.5.3.1. drc::add_waiver Command 2.5.5.5.3.2. drc::get_waivers Command 2.5.5.5.3.3. drc::report_waivers Command
3. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software x
3.1. Metastability Analysis in the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software 3.2. Metastability and MTBF Reporting 3.3. MTBF Optimization 3.4. Reducing Metastability Effects 3.5. Scripting Support 3.6. Managing Metastability 3.7. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software Revision History 3.8. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guide: Design Recommendations Archive
3.1. Metastability Analysis in the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software x
3.1.1. Synchronization Register Chains 3.1.2. Identify Synchronizers for Metastability Analysis 3.1.3. How Timing Constraints Affect Synchronizer Identification and Metastability Analysis
3.2. Metastability and MTBF Reporting x
3.2.1. Metastability Reports 3.2.2. Synchronizer Data Toggle Rate in MTBF Calculation
3.2.1. Metastability Reports x
3.2.1.1. MTBF Summary Report 3.2.1.2. Synchronizer Summary Report 3.2.1.3. Synchronizer Chain Statistics Report in the Timing Analyzer
3.2.1.1. MTBF Summary Report x
3.2.1.1.1. Typical and Worst-Case MTBF of Design 3.2.1.1.2. Synchronizer Chains 3.2.1.1.3. Increasing Available Settling Time
3.3. MTBF Optimization x
3.3.1. Synchronization Register Chain Length
3.4. Reducing Metastability Effects x
3.4.1. Apply Complete System-Centric Timing Constraints for the Timing Analyzer 3.4.2. Force the Identification of Synchronization Registers 3.4.3. Set the Synchronizer Data Toggle Rate 3.4.4. Optimize Metastability During Fitting 3.4.5. Increase the Length of Synchronizers to Protect and Optimize 3.4.6. Increase the Number of Stages Used in Synchronizers 3.4.7. Select a Faster Speed Grade Device
3.5. Scripting Support x
3.5.1. Identifying Synchronizers for Metastability Analysis 3.5.2. Synchronizer Data Toggle Rate in MTBF Calculation 3.5.3. report_metastability and Tcl Command 3.5.4. MTBF Optimization 3.5.5. Synchronization Register Chain Length
1. Recommended HDL Coding Styles
2. Recommended Design Practices
3. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software
A. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guides

1.5.3.2. Inferring Latches Correctly

Synthesis tools can infer a latch that does not exhibit the glitch and timing hazard problems typically associated with combinational loops. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition software reports latches that synthesis inferred in the User-Specified and Inferred Latches section of the Compilation Report. This report indicates whether the latch presents a timing hazard, and the total number of user-specified and inferred latches.
Note: In some cases, timing analysis does not completely model latch timing. As a best practice, avoid latches unless required by the design and you fully understand the impact.

If latches or combinational loops in the design do not appear in the User Specified and Inferred Latches section, then Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis did not infer the latch as a safe latch, so the latch is not considered glitch-free.

All combinational loops listed in the Analysis & Synthesis Logic Cells Representing Combinational Loops table in the Compilation Report are at risk of timing hazards. These entries indicate possible problems with the design that require further investigation. However, correct designs can include combinational loops. For example, it is possible that the combinational loop cannot be sensitized. This occurs when there is an electrical path in the hardware, but either:

  • The designer knows that the circuit never encounters data that causes that path to be activated, or
  • The surrounding logic is set up in a mutually exclusive manner that prevents that path from ever being sensitized, independent of the data input.

For 6-input LUT-based devices, Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis implements all latch inputs with a single adaptive look-up table (ALUT) in the combinational loop. Therefore, all latches in the User-Specified and Inferred Latches table are free of timing hazards when a single input changes.

If Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis report lists a latch as a safe latch, other optimizations, such as physical synthesis netlist optimizations in the Fitter, maintain the hazard-free performance. To ensure hazard-free behavior, only one control input can change at a time. Changing two inputs simultaneously, such as deasserting set and reset at the same time, or changing data and enable at the same time, can produce incorrect behavior in any latch.

Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis infers latches from always blocks in Verilog HDL and process statements in VHDL. However, Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis does not infer latches from continuous assignments in Verilog HDL, or concurrent signal assignments in VHDL. These rules are the same as for register inference. The Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis infers registers or flipflops only from always blocks and process statements.

Verilog HDL Set-Reset Latch

module simple_latch (
   input SetTerm,
   input ResetTerm,
   output reg LatchOut
   );
   always @ (SetTerm or ResetTerm) begin
      if (SetTerm)
         LatchOut = 1'b1;
      else if (ResetTerm)
         LatchOut = 1'b0;
   end
endmodule

VHDL Data Type Latch

LIBRARY IEEE;
USE IEEE.std_logic_1164.all;
ENTITY simple_latch IS
	PORT (
		enable, data    : IN STD_LOGIC;
		q               : OUT STD_LOGIC
	);
END simple_latch;
ARCHITECTURE rtl OF simple_latch IS
BEGIN
	latch : PROCESS (enable, data)
		BEGIN
		IF (enable = '1') THEN
			q <= data;
		END IF;
	END PROCESS latch;
END rtl;

Verilog Continuous Assignment Does Not Infer Latch

The following example shows a Verilog HDL continuous assignment that does not infer a latch in the Intel® Quartus® Prime software: 

assign latch_out = (~en & latch_out) | (en & data);

The behavior of the assignment is similar to a latch, but it may not function correctly as a latch, and its timing is not analyzed as a latch. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition synthesis also creates safe latches when possible for instantiations of an Intel FPGA latch IP core. Intel FPGA latch IPs allow you to define a latch with any combination of data, enable, set, and reset inputs. The same limitations apply for creating safe latches as for inferring latches from HDL code.

Inferring the Intel FPGA latch IP core in another synthesis tool ensures that Intel® Quartus® Prime synthesis also recognizes the implementation as a latch. If a third-party synthesis tool implements a latch using the Intel FPGA latch IP core, Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition synthesis reports the latch in the User-Specified and Inferred Latches table, in the same manner as it lists latches you define in HDL source code. The coding style necessary to produce an Intel FPGA latch IP core implementation depends on the synthesis tool. Some third-party synthesis tools list the number of Intel FPGA latch IP cores that are inferred.

The Fitter uses global routing for control signals, including signals that synthesis identifies as latch enables. In some cases, the global insertion delay decreases timing performance. If necessary, you can turn off the Intel® Quartus® Prime Global Signal logic option to manually prevent the use of global signals. The Global & Other Fast Signals table in the Compilation Report reports Global latch enables.

Level Two Title