Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guide: Design Recommendations

Download PDF
ID 683082
Date 6/20/2022
Public

A newer version of this document is available. Customers should click here to go to the newest version.

Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. Recommended HDL Coding Styles 2. Recommended Design Practices 3. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software 4. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guide: Design Recommendations Archive A. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guides
1. Recommended HDL Coding Styles x
1.1. Using Provided HDL Templates 1.2. Instantiating IP Cores in HDL 1.3. Inferring Multipliers and DSP Functions 1.4. Inferring Memory Functions from HDL Code 1.5. Register and Latch Coding Guidelines 1.6. General Coding Guidelines 1.7. Designing with Low-Level Primitives 1.8. Recommended HDL Coding Styles Revision History
1.1. Using Provided HDL Templates x
1.1.1. Inserting HDL Code from a Provided Template
1.3. Inferring Multipliers and DSP Functions x
1.3.1. Inferring Multipliers 1.3.2. Inferring Multiply-Accumulator and Multiply-Adder Functions
1.4. Inferring Memory Functions from HDL Code x
1.4.1. Inferring RAM functions from HDL Code 1.4.2. Inferring ROM Functions from HDL Code 1.4.3. Inferring Shift Registers in HDL Code 1.4.4. Inferring FIFOs in HDL Code
1.4.1. Inferring RAM functions from HDL Code x
1.4.1.1. Use Synchronous Memory Blocks 1.4.1.2. Avoid Unsupported Reset and Control Conditions 1.4.1.3. Check Read-During-Write Behavior 1.4.1.4. Controlling RAM Inference and Implementation 1.4.1.5. Single-Clock Synchronous RAM with Old Data Read-During-Write Behavior 1.4.1.6. Single-Clock Synchronous RAM with New Data Read-During-Write Behavior 1.4.1.7. Simple Dual-Port, Dual-Clock Synchronous RAM 1.4.1.8. True Dual-Port Synchronous RAM 1.4.1.9. Mixed-Width Dual-Port RAM 1.4.1.10. RAM with Byte-Enable Signals 1.4.1.11. Specifying Initial Memory Contents at Power-Up
1.4.3. Inferring Shift Registers in HDL Code x
1.4.3.1. Simple Shift Register 1.4.3.2. Shift Register with Evenly Spaced Taps
1.4.4. Inferring FIFOs in HDL Code x
1.4.4.1. Dual Clock FIFO Example in Verilog HDL 1.4.4.2. Dual Clock FIFO Timing Constraints
1.5. Register and Latch Coding Guidelines x
1.5.1. Register Power-Up Values 1.5.2. Secondary Register Control Signals Such as Clear and Clock Enable 1.5.3. Latches
1.5.1. Register Power-Up Values x
1.5.1.1. Specifying a Power-Up Value
1.5.3. Latches x
1.5.3.1. Avoid Unintentional Latch Generation 1.5.3.2. Inferring Latches Correctly
1.6. General Coding Guidelines x
1.6.1. Tri-State Signals 1.6.2. Clock Multiplexing 1.6.3. Adder Trees 1.6.4. State Machine HDL Guidelines 1.6.5. Multiplexer HDL Guidelines 1.6.6. Cyclic Redundancy Check Functions 1.6.7. Comparator HDL Guidelines 1.6.8. Counter HDL Guidelines
1.6.3. Adder Trees x
1.6.3.1. Architectures with 6-Input LUTs in Adaptive Logic Modules
1.6.4. State Machine HDL Guidelines x
1.6.4.1. State Machine Power-Up 1.6.4.2. Verilog HDL State Machines 1.6.4.3. VHDL State Machines
1.6.4.2. Verilog HDL State Machines x
1.6.4.2.1. Verilog-2001 State Machine Coding Example 1.6.4.2.2. SystemVerilog State Machine Coding Example
1.6.4.3. VHDL State Machines x
1.6.4.3.1. VHDL State Machine Coding Example
1.6.5. Multiplexer HDL Guidelines x
1.6.5.1. Intel® Quartus® Prime Software Option for Multiplexer Restructuring 1.6.5.2. Multiplexer Types 1.6.5.3. Implicit Defaults in IF Statements 1.6.5.4. default or OTHERS CASE Assignment
1.6.5.2. Multiplexer Types x
1.6.5.2.1. Binary Multiplexers 1.6.5.2.2. Selector Multiplexers 1.6.5.2.3. Priority Multiplexers
1.6.6. Cyclic Redundancy Check Functions x
1.6.6.1. If Performance is Important, Optimize for Speed 1.6.6.2. Use Separate CRC Blocks Instead of Cascaded Stages 1.6.6.3. Use Separate CRC Blocks Instead of Allowing Blocks to Merge 1.6.6.4. Take Advantage of Latency if Available 1.6.6.5. Save Power by Disabling CRC Blocks When Not in Use 1.6.6.6. Initialize the Device with the Synchronous Load (sload) Signal
2. Recommended Design Practices x
2.1. Following Synchronous FPGA Design Practices 2.2. HDL Design Guidelines 2.3. Use Clock and Register-Control Architectural Features 2.4. Implementing Embedded RAM 2.5. Design Assistant Design Rule Checking 2.6. Recommended Design Practices Revision History
2.1. Following Synchronous FPGA Design Practices x
2.1.1. Implementing Synchronous Designs 2.1.2. Asynchronous Design Hazards
2.2. HDL Design Guidelines x
2.2.1. Considerations for the Intel® Hyperflex™ FPGA Architecture 2.2.2. Optimizing Combinational Logic 2.2.3. Optimizing Clocking Schemes 2.2.4. Optimizing Physical Implementation and Timing Closure 2.2.5. Optimizing Power Consumption 2.2.6. Managing Design Metastability
2.2.2. Optimizing Combinational Logic x
2.2.2.1. Avoid Combinational Loops 2.2.2.2. Avoid Unintended Latch Inference 2.2.2.3. Avoid Delay Chains in Clock Paths 2.2.2.4. Use Synchronous Pulse Generators
2.2.3. Optimizing Clocking Schemes x
2.2.3.1. Register Combinational Logic Outputs 2.2.3.2. Avoid Asynchronous Clock Division 2.2.3.3. Avoid Ripple Counters 2.2.3.4. Use Multiplexed Clocks 2.2.3.5. Use Gated Clocks 2.2.3.6. Use Synchronous Clock Enables
2.2.3.5. Use Gated Clocks x
2.2.3.5.1. Recommended Clock-Gating Methods
2.2.4. Optimizing Physical Implementation and Timing Closure x
2.2.4.1. Planning Physical Implementation 2.2.4.2. Planning FPGA Resources 2.2.4.3. Optimizing for Timing Closure 2.2.4.4. Optimizing Critical Timing Paths
2.3. Use Clock and Register-Control Architectural Features x
2.3.1. Use Global Reset Resources 2.3.2. Use Global Clock Network Resources 2.3.3. Use Clock Region Assignments to Optimize Clock Constraints 2.3.4. Avoid Asynchronous Register Control Signals
2.3.1. Use Global Reset Resources x
2.3.1.1. Use Synchronous Resets Verilog HDL Code for Externally Synchronized Reset SDC Constraints for Externally Synchronized Reset Verilog HDL Code for Internally Synchronized Reset SDC Constraints for Internally Synchronized Reset 2.3.1.2. Using Asynchronous Resets 2.3.1.3. Use Synchronized Asynchronous Reset
2.3.3. Use Clock Region Assignments to Optimize Clock Constraints x
2.3.3.1. Clock Region Assignments in Intel® Stratix® 10 Devices 2.3.3.2. Clock Region Assignments in Intel® Arria® 10 and Older Device Families
2.5. Design Assistant Design Rule Checking x
2.5.1. Setting Up Design Assistant 2.5.2. Running Design Assistant During Compilation 2.5.3. Running Design Assistant in Analysis Mode 2.5.4. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant 2.5.5. Managing Design Assistant Rules 2.5.6. Design Assistant Rule Categories
2.5.1. Setting Up Design Assistant x
2.5.1.1. Design Assistant Rule Severity Levels
2.5.2. Running Design Assistant During Compilation x
2.5.2.1. Opening Design Assistant Rule Help
2.5.3. Running Design Assistant in Analysis Mode x
2.5.3.1. Launching Design Assistant from Chip Planner 2.5.3.2. Launching Design Assistant from Timing Analyzer
2.5.4. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant x
2.5.4.1. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant to Timing Analyzer 2.5.4.2. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant to Visualization Tools
2.5.5. Managing Design Assistant Rules x
2.5.5.1. Changing the Default Number of Violations per Rule 2.5.5.2. Enabling Rules for Specific Compiler Stages 2.5.5.3. Specifying Rule Parameters for a Specific Compiler Stage 2.5.5.4. Modifying Rule Severity Levels 2.5.5.5. Waiving Design Assistant Rules 2.5.5.6. Design Assistant Tags
2.5.5.5. Waiving Design Assistant Rules x
2.5.5.5.1. Creating Design Assistant Waivers 2.5.5.5.2. Design Assistant Waiver Dialog Box 2.5.5.5.3. Deleting Design Assistant Waivers 2.5.5.5.4. Design Assistant Waiver Tcl Commands 2.5.5.5.5. drc::add_waiver Command 2.5.5.5.6. drc::get_waivers Command 2.5.5.5.7. drc::report_waivers Command
3. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software x
3.1. Metastability Analysis in the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software 3.2. Metastability and MTBF Reporting 3.3. MTBF Optimization 3.4. Reducing Metastability Effects 3.5. Scripting Support 3.6. Managing Metastability 3.7. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software Revision History
3.1. Metastability Analysis in the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software x
3.1.1. Data Synchronization Register Chains 3.1.2. Identify Synchronizers for Metastability Analysis 3.1.3. How Timing Constraints Affect Synchronizer Identification and Metastability Analysis
3.2. Metastability and MTBF Reporting x
3.2.1. Metastability Reports 3.2.2. Synchronizer Data Toggle Rate in MTBF Calculation
3.2.1. Metastability Reports x
3.2.1.1. MTBF Summary Report 3.2.1.2. Synchronizer Summary Report 3.2.1.3. Synchronizer Chain Statistics Report in the Timing Analyzer
3.2.1.1. MTBF Summary Report x
3.2.1.1.1. Typical and Worst-Case MTBF of Design 3.2.1.1.2. Synchronizer Chains 3.2.1.1.3. Increasing Available Settling Time
3.3. MTBF Optimization x
3.3.1. Synchronization Register Chain Length
3.4. Reducing Metastability Effects x
3.4.1. Apply Complete System-Centric Timing Constraints for the Timing Analyzer 3.4.2. Force the Identification of Synchronization Registers 3.4.3. Set the Synchronizer Data Toggle Rate 3.4.4. Optimize Metastability During Fitting 3.4.5. Increase the Length of Synchronizers to Protect and Optimize 3.4.6. Increase the Number of Stages Used in Synchronizers 3.4.7. Select a Faster Speed Grade Device
3.5. Scripting Support x
3.5.1. Identifying Synchronizers for Metastability Analysis 3.5.2. Synchronizer Data Toggle Rate in MTBF Calculation 3.5.3. report_metastability and Tcl Command 3.5.4. MTBF Optimization 3.5.5. Synchronization Register Chain Length
1. Recommended HDL Coding Styles
2. Recommended Design Practices
3. Managing Metastability with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Software
4. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guide: Design Recommendations Archive
A. Intel® Quartus® Prime Pro Edition User Guides

2.3.1.1. Use Synchronous Resets

The synchronous reset ensures that the circuit is fully synchronous. You can easily time the circuit with the Intel® Quartus® Prime Timing Analyzer.

Because clocks that are synchronous to each other launch and latch the reset signal, the data arrival and data required times are easily determined for proper slack analysis. The synchronous reset is easier to use with cycle-based simulators.

There are two methods by which a reset signal can reach a register; either by being gated in with the data input, or by using an LAB-wide control signal (synclr). If you use the first method, you risk adding an additional gate delay to the circuit to accommodate the reset signal, which causes increased data arrival times and negatively impacts setup slack. The second method relies on dedicated routing in the LAB to each register, but this is slower than an asynchronous reset to the same register.

Figure 15. Synchronous Reset
Figure 16. LAB-Wide Control Signals

Consider two types of synchronous resets when you examine the timing analysis of synchronous resets—externally synchronized resets and internally synchronized resets. Externally synchronized resets are synchronized to the clock domain outside the FPGA, and are not very common. A power-on asynchronous reset is dual-rank synchronized externally to the system clock and then brought into the FPGA. Inside the FPGA, gate this reset with the data input to the registers to implement a synchronous reset.

Figure 17. Externally Synchronized Reset

The following example shows the Verilog HDL equivalent of the schematic. When you use synchronous resets, the reset signal is not put in the sensitivity list.

The following example shows the necessary modifications that you should make to the internally synchronized reset.

Verilog HDL Code for Externally Synchronized Reset


module sync_reset_ext (
         input   clock,
         input   reset_n,
         input   data_a,
         input   data_b,
         output  out_a,
         output  out_b
         );
reg      reg1, reg2
assign   out_a  = reg1;
assign   out_b  = reg2;
always @ (posedge clock)
begin
     if (!reset_n)
     begin
         reg1     <= 1’b0;
         reg2     <= 1’b0;
    end
    else
    begin
         reg1     <= data_a;
         reg2     <= data_b;
    end
end
endmodule     //  sync_reset_ext

The following example shows the constraints for the externally synchronous reset. Because the external reset is synchronous, you only need to constrain the reset_n signal as a normal input signal with set_input_delay constraint for -max and -min.

SDC Constraints for Externally Synchronized Reset


# Input clock - 100 MHz
create_clock [get_ports {clock}] \
        -name {clock} \
        -period 10.0 \
        -waveform {0.0 5.0}
# Input constraints on low-active reset
# and data
set_input_delay 7.0 \
        -max \
        -clock [get_clocks {clock}] \
        [get_ports {reset_n data_a data_b}]
set_input_delay 1.0 \
        -min \
        -clock [get_clocks {clock}] \
        [get_ports {reset_n data_a data_b}]

More often, resets coming into the device are asynchronous, and must be synchronized internally before being sent to the registers.

Figure 18. Internally Synchronized Reset

The following example shows the Verilog HDL equivalent of the schematic. Only the clock edge is in the sensitivity list for a synchronous reset.

Verilog HDL Code for Internally Synchronized Reset


module sync_reset (
		input clock,
		input reset_n,
		input data_a,
		input data_b,
		output out_a,
		output out_b
		);
reg 	reg1, reg2
reg 	reg3, reg4

assign 	out_a = reg1;
assign 	out_b = reg2;
assign 	rst_n = reg4;

always @ (posedge clock)
begin
	if (!rst_n)
	begin
		reg1 <= 1’bo;
		reg2 <= 1’b0;
	end
	else
	begin
		reg1 <= data_a;
		reg2 <= data_b;
	end
end

always @ (posedge clock)
begin
	reg3 <= reset_n;
	reg4 <= reg3;
end
endmodule // sync_reset

The SDC constraints are similar to the external synchronous reset, except that the input reset cannot be constrained because it is asynchronous. Cut the input path with a set_false_path statement to avoid these being considered as unconstrained paths.

SDC Constraints for Internally Synchronized Reset


# Input clock - 100 MHz
create_clock [get_ports {clock}] \
        -name {clock} \
        -period 10.0 \
        -waveform {0.0 5.0}
# Input constraints on data
set_input_delay 7.0 \
        -max \
        -clock [get_clocks {clock}] \
        [get_ports {data_a data_b}]
set_input_delay 1.0 \
        -min \
        -clock [get_clocks {clock}] \
        [get_ports {data_a data_b}]
# Cut the asynchronous reset input
set_false_path \
        -from [get_ports {reset_n}] \
        -to [all_registers]

An issue with synchronous resets is their behavior with respect to short pulses (less than a period) on the asynchronous input to the synchronizer flipflops. This can be a disadvantage because the asynchronous reset requires a pulse width of at least one period wide to guarantee that it is captured by the first flipflop. However, this can also be viewed as an advantage in that this circuit increases noise immunity. Spurious pulses on the asynchronous input have a lower chance of being captured by the first flipflop, so the pulses do not trigger a synchronous reset. In some cases, you might want to increase the noise immunity further and reject any asynchronous input reset that is less than n periods wide to debounce an asynchronous input reset.

Figure 19. Internally Synchronized Reset with Pulse Extender

Junction dots indicate the number of stages. You can have more flipflops to get a wider pulse that spans more clock cycles.

Many designs have more than one clock signal. In these cases, use a separate reset synchronization circuit for each clock domain in the design. When you create synchronizers for PLL output clocks, these clock domains are not reset until you lock the PLL and the PLL output clocks are stable. If you use the reset to the PLL, this reset does not have to be synchronous with the input clock of the PLL. You can use an asynchronous reset for this. Using a reset to the PLL further delays the assertion of a synchronous reset to the PLL output clock domains when using internally synchronized resets.

Level Two Title