Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition: Best Practices Guide

Download PDF
ID 683521
Date 10/04/2021
Public

A newer version of this document is available. Customers should click here to go to the newest version.

Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. Introduction to Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide 2. Reviewing Your Kernel's report.html File 3. OpenCL Kernel Design Concepts 4. OpenCL Kernel Design Best Practices 5. Profiling Your Kernel to Identify Performance Bottlenecks 6. Strategies for Improving Single Work-Item Kernel Performance 7. Strategies for Improving NDRange Kernel Data Processing Efficiency 8. Strategies for Improving Memory Access Efficiency 9. Strategies for Optimizing FPGA Area Usage 10. Strategies for Optimizing Intel® Stratix® 10 OpenCL Designs 11. Strategies for Improving Performance in Your Host Application 12. Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide Archives A. Document Revision History for the Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide
1. Introduction to Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide x
1.1. FPGA Overview 1.2. Pipelines 1.3. Single Work-Item Kernel versus NDRange Kernel
2. Reviewing Your Kernel's report.html File x
2.1. High-Level Design Report Layout 2.2. Reviewing the Summary Report 2.3. Viewing Throughput Bottlenecks in the Design 2.4. Using Views 2.5. Analyzing Throughput 2.6. Reviewing Area Information 2.7. Optimizing an OpenCL Design Example Based on Information in the HTML Report 2.8. Accessing HLD FPGA Reports in JSON Format
2.4. Using Views x
2.4.1. Features of the System Viewer 2.4.2. Features of the Kernel Memory Viewer 2.4.3. Features of the Schedule Viewer
2.4.1. Features of the System Viewer x
2.4.1.1. Reviewing System Information 2.4.1.2. Reviewing Global Memory Information 2.4.1.3. Reviewing Block Information 2.4.1.4. Reviewing Cluster Information
2.5. Analyzing Throughput x
2.5.1. Reviewing Loop Information
2.6. Reviewing Area Information x
2.6.1. Area Report Message for Board Interface 2.6.2. Area Report Message for Function Overhead 2.6.3. Area Report Message for State 2.6.4. Area Report Message for Feedback 2.6.5. Area Report Messages for Private Variable Storage
2.6.5. Area Report Messages for Private Variable Storage x
2.6.5.1. Area Report Message for Constant Memory
3. OpenCL Kernel Design Concepts x
3.1. Kernels 3.2. Global Memory Interconnect 3.3. Local Memory 3.4. Loops in a Single Work-Item Kernel 3.5. Channels 3.6. Load-Store Units
3.3. Local Memory x
3.3.1. Changing the Memory Access Pattern Example
3.4. Loops in a Single Work-Item Kernel x
3.4.1. Trade-Off Between Initiation Interval and Maximum Frequency 3.4.2. Loop-Carried Dependencies that Affect the Initiation Interval of a Loop 3.4.3. Nested Loops 3.4.4. Loop Speculation 3.4.5. Loop Fusion Fusion Criteria Automatic Loop Fusion 3.4.6. Loop Bottlenecks
3.4.3. Nested Loops x
3.4.3.1. Reducing the Area Consumed by Nested Loops Using loop_coalesce
3.6. Load-Store Units x
3.6.1. Load-Store Unit Types 3.6.2. Load-Store Unit Modifiers 3.6.3. Controlling the Load-Store Units 3.6.4. When to Use Each LSU
4. OpenCL Kernel Design Best Practices x
4.1. Transferring Data Via Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Channels or OpenCL Pipes 4.2. Unrolling Loops 4.3. Optimizing Floating-Point Operations 4.4. Allocating Aligned Memory 4.5. Aligning a Struct with or without Padding 4.6. Maintaining Similar Structures for Vector Type Elements 4.7. Avoiding Pointer Aliasing 4.8. Avoid Expensive Functions 4.9. Avoiding Work-Item ID-Dependent Backward Branching
4.1. Transferring Data Via Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Channels or OpenCL Pipes x
4.1.1. Characteristics of Channels and Pipes 4.1.2. Execution Order for Channels and Pipes 4.1.3. Optimizing Buffer Inference for Channels or Pipes 4.1.4. Best Practices for Channels and Pipes
4.3. Optimizing Floating-Point Operations x
4.3.1. Floating-Point versus Fixed-Point Representations
5. Profiling Your Kernel to Identify Performance Bottlenecks x
5.1. Best Practices for Profiling Your Kernel 5.2. Instrumenting the Kernel Pipeline with Performance Counters (-profile) 5.3. Obtaining Profiling Data During Runtime 5.4. Reducing Area Resource Use While Profiling 5.5. Temporal Performance Collection 5.6. Performance Data Types 5.7. Interpreting the Profiling Information 5.8. Profiler Analyses of Example OpenCL Design Scenarios 5.9. Intel® FPGA Dynamic Profiler for OpenCL™ Limitations
5.3. Obtaining Profiling Data During Runtime x
5.3.1. Invoking the Profiler Runtime Wrapper 5.3.2. Viewing Profiling Data Using Intel® VTune™ Profiler
5.3.1. Invoking the Profiler Runtime Wrapper x
5.3.1.1. Splitting Execution and Data Post Processing
5.5. Temporal Performance Collection x
5.5.1. Profiling Autorun Kernels
5.7. Interpreting the Profiling Information x
5.7.1. Stall, Occupancy, Bandwidth 5.7.2. Stalling Channels 5.7.3. Channel Depths
5.8. Profiler Analyses of Example OpenCL Design Scenarios x
5.8.1. High Stall Percentage 5.8.2. Low Occupancy Percentage 5.8.3. High Stall and High Occupancy Percentages 5.8.4. No Stalls, Low Occupancy Percentage, and Low Bandwidth 5.8.5. No Stalls, High Occupancy Percentage, and Low Bandwidth 5.8.6. High Stall and Low Occupancy Percentages
6. Strategies for Improving Single Work-Item Kernel Performance x
6.1. Addressing Single Work-Item Kernel Dependencies Based on Optimization Report Feedback 6.2. Good Design Practices for Single Work-Item Kernel
6.1. Addressing Single Work-Item Kernel Dependencies Based on Optimization Report Feedback x
6.1.1. Removing Loop-Carried Dependency 6.1.2. Relaxing Loop-Carried Dependency 6.1.3. Transferring Loop-Carried Dependency to Local Memory 6.1.4. Relaxing Loop-Carried Dependency by Inferring Shift Registers 6.1.5. Removing Loop-Carried Dependencies Caused by Accesses to Memory Arrays
7. Strategies for Improving NDRange Kernel Data Processing Efficiency x
7.1. Specifying a Maximum Work-group Size or a Required Work-Group Size 7.2. Kernel Vectorization 7.3. Multiple Compute Units 7.4. Combination of Compute Unit Replication and Kernel SIMD Vectorization 7.5. Reviewing Kernel Properties and Loop Unroll Status in the HTML Report
7.3. Multiple Compute Units x
7.3.1. Compute Unit Replication versus Kernel SIMD Vectorization
8. Strategies for Improving Memory Access Efficiency x
8.1. General Guidelines on Optimizing Memory Accesses 8.2. Optimize Global Memory Accesses 8.3. Performing Kernel Computations Using Constant, Local or Private Memory 8.4. Improving Kernel Performance by Banking the Local Memory 8.5. Optimizing Accesses to Local Memory by Controlling the Memory Replication Factor 8.6. Minimizing the Memory Dependencies for Loop Pipelining 8.7. Static Memory Coalescing
8.2. Optimize Global Memory Accesses x
8.2.1. Contiguous Memory Accesses 8.2.2. Manual Partitioning of Global Memory 8.2.3. Optimizing for Two or More Banks of Global Memory
8.2.2. Manual Partitioning of Global Memory x
8.2.2.1. Heterogeneous Memory Buffers
8.3. Performing Kernel Computations Using Constant, Local or Private Memory x
8.3.1. Constant Cache Memory 8.3.2. Preloading Data to Local Memory 8.3.3. Storing Variables and Arrays in Private Memory
8.4. Improving Kernel Performance by Banking the Local Memory x
8.4.1. Optimizing the Geometric Configuration of Local Memory Banks Based on Array Index
9. Strategies for Optimizing FPGA Area Usage x
9.1. Compilation Considerations 9.2. Board Variant Selection Considerations 9.3. Memory Access Considerations 9.4. Arithmetic Operation Considerations 9.5. Data Type Selection Considerations
10. Strategies for Optimizing Intel® Stratix® 10 OpenCL Designs x
10.1. Reducing Channel Overhead 10.2. Optimizing Loop Control 10.3. Simplifying Memory Access to Local Memories 10.4. On-Chip Storage of Reused Data 10.5. Optimizing Data Path Control 10.6. Creating RTL Modules
10.1. Reducing Channel Overhead x
10.1.1. Reducing the Number of Kernels 10.1.2. Using a Single Kernel to Describe Systolic Arrays 10.1.3. Using Non-Blocking Channels
10.2. Optimizing Loop Control x
10.2.1. Simplifying Loop-Carried Dependencies in Intel® Stratix® 10 OpenCL Designs
10.6. Creating RTL Modules x
10.6.1. Reset Recommendations
11. Strategies for Improving Performance in Your Host Application x
11.1. Multi-Threaded Host Application 11.2. Utilizing Hardware Kernel Invocation Queue
11.2. Utilizing Hardware Kernel Invocation Queue x
11.2.1. Double Buffered Host Application Utilizing Kernel Invocation Queue
1. Introduction to Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide
2. Reviewing Your Kernel's report.html File
3. OpenCL Kernel Design Concepts
4. OpenCL Kernel Design Best Practices
5. Profiling Your Kernel to Identify Performance Bottlenecks
6. Strategies for Improving Single Work-Item Kernel Performance
7. Strategies for Improving NDRange Kernel Data Processing Efficiency
8. Strategies for Improving Memory Access Efficiency
9. Strategies for Optimizing FPGA Area Usage
10. Strategies for Optimizing Intel® Stratix® 10 OpenCL Designs
11. Strategies for Improving Performance in Your Host Application
12. Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide Archives
A. Document Revision History for the Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Pro Edition Best Practices Guide

3.4.5. Loop Fusion

Loop fusion is a compiler transformation in which two adjacent loops are merged into a single loop over the same index range. This transformation is typically applied to reduce loop overhead and improve run-time performance.

The following example shows the effects of fusing loops in a simple case:
Unfused Loops Fused Loops 
for (i = 0; i < 300; i++)
    a[i] = a[i] + 3;
for (i = 0; i < 300; i++)
    b[i] = b[i] + 4;
 
for (i = 0; i < 300; i++) {
    a[i] = a[i] + 3;
    b[i] = b[i] + 4;
}

Loop control structures represent a significant overhead. By fusing two loops, the number of control structures needed for the loops is reduced from two to one, reducing this overhead. The main goal of reducing the number of control structures is to save FPGA area for your design while still maintaining (ideally increasing) component throughput.

Fusing outer loops introduces concurrency where there was previously none. Combining bodies of two adjacent loops (Lj and Lk) forms a single loop (Lf) with a loop body that spans the bodies of Lj and Lk. This combined loop body creates an opportunity for operations that were serialized across a given iteration of Lj and Lk to execute concurrently. In effect, the two loops now execute as one, reducing latency.

If inner loops are fused, concurrency is already achieved by pipelined execution of the outer loop iteration. In these cases, the concurrency effect of loop fusion is diminished.

Fusion Criteria

The compiler considers the fusion of two loops (Lj and Lk) to be valid if the loops meet the following criteria:
  • The loops must be adjacent.

    That is, you cannot have a statement Si with side-effects such that Si executes after Lj and before Lk.

  • Each loop must have a single-entry point and a single exit point. For example, loops that contain break statements are not considered for fusion.
  • The loops must have no negative-distance dependencies.

    That is, for loops Lj and Lk where Lj is defined before Lk, iteration m of loop Lk does not depend on values calculated in iteration m+n (where n>0) of loop Lj.

Automatic Loop Fusion

The Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Offline Compiler fuses loops with the same trip counts automatically if the compiler analysis of your component determines that fusing the loops is profitable.

Examples of where fusing loops is a valid transformation (based on the earlier criteria) but are not considered profitable by the compiler include the following situations:
  • One of the two loops, but not both, is annotated with the ivdep pragma.
  • One of the two loops, but not both, contains stall-free logic.

The Loop Analysis Report in the High-Level Design Reports indicates when loops were fused.

In addition to automatic loop fusion, the Intel® FPGA SDK for OpenCL™ Offline Compiler provides two pragmas to help you control when loops are fused:
  • loop_fuse pragma

    Override the compiler profitability analysis and fuse adjacent loops if it is safe.

  • nofusion pragma

    Annotate loops with this pragma to request that the compiler not fuse the annotated loop.

Level Two Title