Intel® High Level Synthesis Compiler Pro Edition: Best Practices Guide

Download PDF
ID 683152
Date 9/23/2022
Public

A newer version of this document is available. Customers should click here to go to the newest version.

Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition Best Practices Guide 2. Best Practices for Coding and Compiling Your Component 3. FPGA Concepts 4. Interface Best Practices 5. Loop Best Practices 6. fMAX Bottleneck Best Practices 7. Memory Architecture Best Practices 8. System of Tasks Best Practices 9. Datatype Best Practices 10. Advanced Troubleshooting A. Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition Best Practices Guide Archives B. Document Revision History for Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition Best Practices Guide
3. FPGA Concepts x
3.1. FPGA Architecture Overview 3.2. Concepts of FPGA Hardware Design 3.3. Methods of Hardware Design
3.1. FPGA Architecture Overview x
3.1.1. Adaptive Logic Module (ALM) 3.1.2. Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Block 3.1.3. Random-Access Memory (RAM) Blocks
3.1.1. Adaptive Logic Module (ALM) x
3.1.1.1. Lookup Table (LUT) 3.1.1.2. Register
3.2. Concepts of FPGA Hardware Design x
3.2.1. Maximum Frequency (fMAX) 3.2.2. Latency 3.2.3. Pipelining 3.2.4. Throughput 3.2.5. Datapath 3.2.6. Control Path 3.2.7. Occupancy
3.3. Methods of Hardware Design x
3.3.1. How Source Code Becomes a Custom Hardware Datapath 3.3.2. Scheduling 3.3.3. Mapping Parallelism Models to FPGA Hardware 3.3.4. Memory Types
3.3.1. How Source Code Becomes a Custom Hardware Datapath x
3.3.1.1. Mapping Source Code Instructions to Hardware 3.3.1.2. Mapping Arrays and Their Accesses to Hardware
3.3.2. Scheduling x
3.3.2.1. Dynamic Scheduling 3.3.2.2. Clustering the Datapath 3.3.2.3. Handshaking Between Clusters
3.3.3. Mapping Parallelism Models to FPGA Hardware x
3.3.3.1. Data Parallelism 3.3.3.2. Task Parallelism
3.3.3.1. Data Parallelism x
3.3.3.1.1. Executing Independent Operations Simultaneously 3.3.3.1.2. Pipelining
3.3.3.1.2. Pipelining x
3.3.3.1.2.1. Pipelining Loops Within A Component 3.3.3.1.2.2. Pipelining Across Component Invocations
3.3.4. Memory Types x
3.3.4.1. Component Memory 3.3.4.2. External Memory
4. Interface Best Practices x
4.1. Choose the Right Interface for Your Component 4.2. Control LSUs For Your Variable-Latency MM Host Interfaces 4.3. Avoid Pointer Aliasing
4.1. Choose the Right Interface for Your Component x
4.1.1. Pointer Interfaces 4.1.2. Avalon® Memory Mapped Host Interfaces 4.1.3. Avalon® Memory Mapped Agent Memories 4.1.4. Avalon® Memory Mapped Agent Registers 4.1.5. Avalon® Streaming Interfaces 4.1.6. Pass-by-Value Interface
5. Loop Best Practices x
5.1. Reuse Hardware By Calling It In a Loop 5.2. Parallelize Loops 5.3. Construct Well-Formed Loops 5.4. Minimize Loop-Carried Dependencies 5.5. Avoid Complex Loop-Exit Conditions 5.6. Convert Nested Loops into a Single Loop 5.7. Place if-Statements in the Lowest Possible Scope in a Loop Nest 5.8. Declare Variables in the Deepest Scope Possible 5.9. Raise Loop II to Increase fMAX 5.10. Control Loop Interleaving
5.2. Parallelize Loops x
5.2.1. Pipeline Loops 5.2.2. Unroll Loops 5.2.3. Example: Loop Pipelining and Unrolling
6. fMAX Bottleneck Best Practices x
6.1. Balancing Target fMAX and Target II
7. Memory Architecture Best Practices x
7.1. Example: Overriding a Coalesced Memory Architecture 7.2. Example: Overriding a Banked Memory Architecture 7.3. Merge Memories to Reduce Area 7.4. Example: Specifying Bank-Selection Bits for Local Memory Addresses
7.3. Merge Memories to Reduce Area x
7.3.1. Example: Merging Memories Depth-Wise 7.3.2. Example: Merging Memories Width-Wise
8. System of Tasks Best Practices x
8.1. Executing Multiple Loops in Parallel 8.2. Sharing an Expensive Compute Block 8.3. Implementing a Hierarchical Design 8.4. Balancing Capacity in a System of Tasks
8.4. Balancing Capacity in a System of Tasks x
8.4.1. Enable the Intel® HLS Compiler to Infer Data Path Buffer Capacity Requirements 8.4.2. Explicitly Add Buffer Capacity to Your Design When Needed
9. Datatype Best Practices x
9.1. Avoid Implicit Data Type Conversions 9.2. Avoid Negative Bit Shifts When Using the ac_int Datatype
10. Advanced Troubleshooting x
10.1. Component Fails Only In Simulation 10.2. Component Gets Poor Quality of Results
1. Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition Best Practices Guide
2. Best Practices for Coding and Compiling Your Component
3. FPGA Concepts
4. Interface Best Practices
5. Loop Best Practices
6. fMAX Bottleneck Best Practices
7. Memory Architecture Best Practices
8. System of Tasks Best Practices
9. Datatype Best Practices
10. Advanced Troubleshooting
A. Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition Best Practices Guide Archives
B. Document Revision History for Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition Best Practices Guide

5.4. Minimize Loop-Carried Dependencies

Loop-carried dependencies occur when the code in a loop iteration depends on the output of previous loop iterations. Loop-carried dependencies in your component increase loop initiation interval (II), which reduces the performance of your component.

The loop structure that follows has a loop-carried dependency because each loop iteration reads data written by the previous iteration. As a result, each read operation cannot proceed until the write operation from the previous iteration completes. The presence of loop-carried dependencies reduces the pipeline parallelism that the Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition can achieve, which reduces component performance. 

for(int i = 1; i < N; i++)
{
    A[i] = A[i - 1] + i;
}

The Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition performs a static memory dependency analysis on loops to determine the extent of parallelism that it can achieve. If the Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition cannot determine that there are no loop-carried dependencies, it assumes that loop-dependencies exist. The ability of the compiler to test for loop-carried dependencies is impeded by unknown variables at compilation time or if array accesses in your code involve complex addressing.

To avoid unnecessary loop-carried dependencies and help the compiler to better analyze your loops, follow these guidelines:

Avoid Pointer Arithmetic

Compiler output is suboptimal when your component accesses arrays by dereferencing pointer values derived from arithmetic operations. For example, avoid accessing an array as follows: 

for(int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
    int t = *(A++);
    *A = t;
}

Introduce Simple Array Indexes

Some types of complex array indexes cannot be analyzed effectively, which might lead to suboptimal compiler output. Avoid the following constructs as much as possible:
  • Nonconstants in array indexes.

    For example, A[K + i], where i is the loop index variable and K is an unknown variable.

  • Multiple index variables in the same subscript location.

    For example, A[i + 2 × j], where i and j are loop index variables for a double nested loop.

    The array index A[i][j] can be analyzed effectively because the index variables are in different subscripts.

  • Nonlinear indexing.

    For example, A[i & C], where i is a loop index variable and C is a nonconstant variable.

Use Loops with Constant Bounds Whenever Possible

The compiler can perform range analysis effectively when loops have constant bounds.

You can place an if-statement inside your loop to control in which iterations the loop body executes.

Ignore Memory Dependencies

If there are no implicit memory dependencies across loop iterations, you can use the ivdep pragma to tell the Intel® HLS Compiler Pro Edition to ignore possible memory dependencies.

For details about how to use the ivdep pragma, see Loop-Carried Dependencies (ivdep Pragma) in the Intel® High Level Synthesis Compiler Pro Edition Reference Manual.

Level Two Title