Visible to Intel only — GUID: GUID-67D47AD5-0E0B-49AC-A349-E42FA7436B80
Package Contents
Parallelizing Simple Loops
Parallelizing Complex Loops
Parallelizing Data Flow and Dependence Graphs
Work Isolation
Exceptions and Cancellation
Containers
Mutual Exclusion
Timing
Memory Allocation
The Task Scheduler
Design Patterns
Migrating from Threading Building Blocks (TBB)
Constrained APIs
Invoke a Callable Object
Appendix A Costs of Time Slicing
Appendix B Mixing With Other Threading Packages
References
parallel_for_each Body semantics and requirements
parallel_sort ranges interface extension
TBB_malloc_replacement_log Function
Type-specified message keys for join_node
Scalable Memory Pools
Helper Functions for Expressing Graphs
concurrent_lru_cache
task_group extensions
The customizing mutex type for concurrent_hash_map
Visible to Intel only — GUID: GUID-67D47AD5-0E0B-49AC-A349-E42FA7436B80
How Task Scheduler Works
While the task scheduler is not bound to any particular type of parallelism, it was designed to work efficiently for fork-join parallelism with lots of forks. This type of parallelism is typical for parallel algorithms such as oneapi::tbb::parallel_for.
Let’s consider the mapping of fork-join parallelism on the task scheduler in more detail.
- The scheduler runs tasks in a way that tries to achieve several targets simultaneously:
-
Enable as many threads as possible, by creating enough job, to achieve actual parallelism
Preserve data locality to make a single thread execution more efficient
Minimize both memory demands and cross-thread communication to reduce an overhead
To achieve this, a balance between depth-first and breadth-first execution strategies must be reached. Assuming that the task graph is finite, depth-first is better for a sequential execution because:
Strike when the cache is hot. The deepest tasks are the most recently created tasks and therefore are the hottest in the cache. Also, if they can be completed, tasks that depend on it can continue executing, and though not the hottest in a cache, they are still warmer than the older tasks deeper in the dequeue.
Minimize space. Execution of the shallowest task leads to the breadth-first unfolding of a graph. It creates an exponential number of nodes that co-exist simultaneously. In contrast, depth-first execution creates the same number of nodes, but only a linear number can exists at the same time, since it creates a stack of other ready tasks.
Each thread has its deque of tasks that are ready to run. When a thread spawns a task, it pushes it onto the bottom of its deque.
When a thread participates in the evaluation of tasks, it constantly executes a task obtained by the first rule that applies from the roughly equivalent ruleset:
Get the task returned by the previous one, if any.
Take a task from the bottom of its deque, if any.
Steal a task from the top of another randomly chosen deque. If the selected deque is empty, the thread tries again to execute this rule until it succeeds.
Rule 1 is described in Task Scheduler Bypass. The overall effect of rule 2 is to execute the youngest task spawned by the thread, which causes the depth-first execution until the thread runs out of work. Then rule 3 applies. It steals the oldest task spawned by another thread, which causes temporary breadth-first execution that converts potential parallelism into actual parallelism.