Visible to Intel only — GUID: GUID-969BEFDE-8A2F-4B29-8631-9E0CCF5463DD
Visible to Intel only — GUID: GUID-969BEFDE-8A2F-4B29-8631-9E0CCF5463DD
DPCT1085
Message
The function <function name> requires sub-group size to be <size>, while other sub-group functions in the same SYCL kernel require a different sub-group size. You may need to adjust the code.
Detailed Help
Each kernel can only be decorated with one sub-group size. This warning is emitted when a kernel requires different sub-group sizes. Check if the sub-group size can be unified into one value, and if it cannot be unified, redesign the code logic.
For example, this original CUDA* code:
__global__ void kernel(int* data1, int* data2) {
typedef cub::WarpScan<int> WarpScan;
typedef cub::WarpScan<int, 16> WarpScan16;
typename WarpScan::TempStorage temp1;
typename WarpScan16::TempStorage temp2;
int input = data1[threadIdx.x];
int output1 = 0;
int output2 = 0;
WarpScan(temp1).InclusiveSum(input, output1);
data1[threadIdx.x] = output1;
WarpScan16(temp2).InclusiveSum(input, output2);
data2[threadIdx.x] = output1;
}
void foo(int* data1, int* data2) {
kernel<<<1, 32>>>(data1, data2);
}
results in the following migrated SYCL* code:
void kernel(int* data1, int* data2, const sycl::nd_item<3> &item_ct1) {
int input = data1[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)];
int output1 = 0;
int output2 = 0;
output1 = sycl::inclusive_scan_over_group(item_ct1.get_sub_group(), input,
sycl::plus<>());
data1[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)] = output1;
/*
DPCT1085:0: The function inclusive_scan_over_group requires sub-group size to
be 16, while other sub-group functions in the same SYCL kernel require a
different sub-group size. You may need to adjust the code.
*/
output2 = sycl::inclusive_scan_over_group(item_ct1.get_sub_group(), input,
sycl::plus<>());
data2[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)] = output1;
}
void foo(int* data1, int* data2) {
dpct::get_in_order_queue().parallel_for(
sycl::nd_range<3>(sycl::range<3>(1, 1, 32), sycl::range<3>(1, 1, 32)),
[=](sycl::nd_item<3> item_ct1) [[intel::reqd_sub_group_size(32)]] {
kernel(data1, data2, item_ct1);
});
}
void foo(int* data) {
dpct::get_in_order_queue().parallel_for(
sycl::nd_range<3>(sycl::range<3>(1, 1, 32), sycl::range<3>(1, 1, 32)),
[=](sycl::nd_item<3> item_ct1) [[intel::reqd_sub_group_size(32)]] {
kernel(data, item_ct1);
});
}
which is manually adjusted to:
void kernel(int* data1, int* data2, const sycl::nd_item<3> &item_ct1) {
int input = data1[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)];
int output1 = 0;
int output2 = 0;
output1 = sycl::inclusive_scan_over_group(item_ct1.get_sub_group(), input,
sycl::plus<>());
data1[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)] = output1;
output2 = sycl::inclusive_scan_over_group(item_ct1.get_sub_group(), input,
sycl::plus<>());
data2[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)] = output1;
item_ct1.barrier();
if (item_ct1.get_local_id(2) % 32 >= 16) {
int warp_id = item_ct1.get_local_id(2) / 32;
data2[item_ct1.get_local_id(2)] -= data2[warp_id * 32 + 15];
}
}
void foo(int* data1, int* data2) {
dpct::get_in_order_queue().parallel_for(
sycl::nd_range<3>(sycl::range<3>(1, 1, 32), sycl::range<3>(1, 1, 32)),
[=](sycl::nd_item<3> item_ct1) [[intel::reqd_sub_group_size(32)]] {
kernel(data1, data2, item_ct1);
});
}
Suggestions to Fix
Code requires manual fix. Rewrite the code manually.