Hyperflex® Architecture High-Performance Design Handbook

Download PDF
ID 683353
Date 12/06/2024
Public
Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
Answers to Top FAQs 1. Hyperflex® FPGA Architecture Introduction 2. Hyperflex® Architecture RTL Design Guidelines 3. Compiling Hyperflex® Architecture Designs 4. Design Example Walk-Through 5. Retiming Restrictions and Workarounds 6. Optimization Example 7. Hyperflex® Architecture Porting Guidelines 8. Appendices 9. Hyperflex® Architecture High-Performance Design Handbook Archive 10. Hyperflex® Architecture High-Performance Design Handbook Revision History
1. Hyperflex® FPGA Architecture Introduction x
1.1. Hyperflex® Architecture Design Concepts
2. Hyperflex® Architecture RTL Design Guidelines x
2.1. High-Speed Design Methodology 2.2. Hyper-Retiming (Facilitate Register Movement) 2.3. Hyper-Pipelining (Add Pipeline Registers) 2.4. Hyper-Optimization (Optimize RTL)
2.1. High-Speed Design Methodology x
2.1.1. Set a High-Speed Target 2.1.2. Experiment and Iterate 2.1.3. Compile Components Independently 2.1.4. Optimize Sub-Modules 2.1.5. Avoid Broadcast Signals
2.1.1. Set a High-Speed Target x
2.1.1.1. Speed and Timing Closure 2.1.1.2. Speed and Latency
2.2. Hyper-Retiming (Facilitate Register Movement) x
2.2.1. Reset Strategies 2.2.2. Clock Enable Strategies 2.2.3. Preserving Registers During Synthesis 2.2.4. Timing Constraint Considerations 2.2.5. Clock Synchronization Strategies 2.2.6. Metastability Synchronizers 2.2.7. Initial Power-Up Conditions 2.2.8. Retiming through RAMs and DSPs
2.2.1. Reset Strategies x
2.2.1.1. Removing Asynchronous Resets 2.2.1.2. Synchronous Resets on Global Clock Trees 2.2.1.3. Synchronous Resets on I/O Ports 2.2.1.4. Duplicate and Pipeline Synchronous Resets
2.2.2. Clock Enable Strategies x
2.2.2.1. Localized Clock Enable 2.2.2.2. High Fan-Out Clock Enable 2.2.2.3. Clock Enable with Timing Exceptions
2.2.4. Timing Constraint Considerations x
2.2.4.1. Optimize Multicycle Paths 2.2.4.2. Overconstraints
2.2.5. Clock Synchronization Strategies x
2.2.5.1. Clock Domain Crossing Constraint Guidelines
2.2.7. Initial Power-Up Conditions x
2.2.7.1. Specifying Initial Memory Conditions 2.2.7.2. Initial Conditions and Retiming 2.2.7.3. Initial Conditions and Hyper-Registers 2.2.7.4. Retiming Reset Sequences
2.2.7.3. Initial Conditions and Hyper-Registers x
2.2.7.3.1. Implementing Clock Gating 2.2.7.3.2. Quartus® Prime Settings for Initial Conditions
2.3. Hyper-Pipelining (Add Pipeline Registers) x
2.3.1. Conventional Versus Hyper-Pipelining 2.3.2. Pipelining and Latency 2.3.3. Use Registers Instead of Multicycle Exceptions
2.3.2. Pipelining and Latency x
2.3.2.1. Pipelining at Variable Latency Locations 2.3.2.2. Automatic Pipeline Insertion
2.3.2.1. Pipelining at Variable Latency Locations x
2.3.2.1.1. Specifying a Latency-Insensitive False Path
2.3.2.2. Automatic Pipeline Insertion x
2.3.2.2.1. Step 1: Create the Variable Latency Module 2.3.2.2.2. Step 2: Instantiate the Variable Latency Module 2.3.2.2.3. Step 3: Verify Automatic Pipeline Insertion Option 2.3.2.2.4. (Optional) Auto-Pipeline Insertion without a Variable Latency Module
2.4. Hyper-Optimization (Optimize RTL) x
2.4.1. General Optimization Techniques 2.4.2. Optimizing Specific Design Structures
2.4.1. General Optimization Techniques x
2.4.1.1. Shannon’s Decomposition 2.4.1.2. Time Domain Multiplexing 2.4.1.3. Loop Unrolling 2.4.1.4. Loop Pipelining 2.4.1.5. Precomputation
2.4.1.1. Shannon’s Decomposition x
2.4.1.1.1. Shannon’s Decomposition Example 2.4.1.1.2. Identifying Circuits for Shannon’s Decomposition
2.4.1.4. Loop Pipelining x
2.4.1.4.1. Loop Pipelining Theory 2.4.1.4.2. Loop Pipelining Demonstration 2.4.1.4.3. Loop Pipelining and Synthesis Optimization
2.4.2. Optimizing Specific Design Structures x
2.4.2.1. High-Speed Clock Domains 2.4.2.2. Restructuring Loops 2.4.2.3. Control Signal Backpressure 2.4.2.4. Flow Control with FIFO Status Signals 2.4.2.5. Flow Control with Skid Buffers 2.4.2.6. Read-Modify-Write Memory 2.4.2.7. Counters and Accumulators 2.4.2.8. State Machines 2.4.2.9. Memory 2.4.2.10. DSP Blocks 2.4.2.11. General Logic 2.4.2.12. Modulus and Division 2.4.2.13. Resets 2.4.2.14. Hardware Re-use 2.4.2.15. Algorithmic Requirements 2.4.2.16. FIFOs 2.4.2.17. Ternary Adders
2.4.2.1. High-Speed Clock Domains x
2.4.2.1.1. Visualizing Clock Networks 2.4.2.1.2. Viewing Clock Networks in the Fitter Report 2.4.2.1.3. Viewing Clocks in the Timing Analyzer
2.4.2.9. Memory x
2.4.2.9.1. Hyperflex® Architecture True Dual-Port Memory 2.4.2.9.2. Use Simple Dual-Port Memories 2.4.2.9.3. Hyperflex® Architecture Simple Dual-Port Memory Example 2.4.2.9.4. Memory Mixed Port Width Ratio Limits 2.4.2.9.5. Unregistered RAM Outputs
3. Compiling Hyperflex® Architecture Designs x
Hyper-Aware Design Flow Register Retiming Fast Forward Compilation Verifying Design RTL 3.1. Compiling Submodules Independently 3.2. Design Assistant Design Rule Checking
3.2. Design Assistant Design Rule Checking x
3.2.1. Running Design Assistant During Compilation 3.2.2. Running Design Assistant in Analysis Mode
3.2.2. Running Design Assistant in Analysis Mode x
3.2.2.1. Cross-Probing from Design Assistant to Visualization Tools 3.2.2.2. Launching Design Assistant from Chip Planner 3.2.2.3. Launching Design Assistant from Timing Analyzer
4. Design Example Walk-Through x
4.1. Median Filter Design Example
4.1. Median Filter Design Example x
4.1.1. Step 1: Compile the Base Design 4.1.2. Step 2: Add Pipeline Stages and Remove Asynchronous Resets 4.1.3. Step 3: Add More Pipeline Stages and Remove All Asynchronous Resets 4.1.4. Step 4: Optimize Short Path and Long Path Conditions
5. Retiming Restrictions and Workarounds x
5.1. Setting the dont_merge Synthesis Attribute 5.2. Interpreting Critical Chain Reports
5.2. Interpreting Critical Chain Reports x
5.2.1. Insufficient Registers 5.2.2. Short Path/Long Path 5.2.3. Fast Forward Limit 5.2.4. Loops 5.2.5. One Critical Chain per Clock Domain 5.2.6. Critical Chains in Related Clock Groups 5.2.7. Complex Critical Chains 5.2.8. Extend to locatable node 5.2.9. Domain Boundary Entry and Domain Boundary Exit 5.2.10. Critical Chains with Dual Clock Memories 5.2.11. Critical Chain Bits and Buses 5.2.12. Delay Lines
5.2.1. Insufficient Registers x
5.2.1.1. Insufficient Registers Example 5.2.1.2. Optimizing Insufficient Registers 5.2.1.3. Critical Chains with Dual Clock Memories
5.2.2. Short Path/Long Path x
5.2.2.1. Hyper-Register Locations Not Available 5.2.2.2. Example for Hold Optimization 5.2.2.3. Optimizing Short Path/Long Path 5.2.2.4. Add Registers 5.2.2.5. Duplicate Common Nodes 5.2.2.6. Data and Control Plane
5.2.3. Fast Forward Limit x
5.2.3.1. Optimizing Path Limit
5.2.4. Loops x
5.2.4.1. Example of Loops Limiting the Critical Chain
6. Optimization Example x
6.1. Round Robin Scheduler
7. Hyperflex® Architecture Porting Guidelines x
7.1. Design Migration and Performance Exploration 7.2. Top-Level Design Considerations
7.1. Design Migration and Performance Exploration x
7.1.1. Black-boxing Verilog HDL Modules 7.1.2. Black-boxing VHDL Modules 7.1.3. Clock Management 7.1.4. Pin Assignments 7.1.5. Transceiver Control Logic 7.1.6. Upgrade Outdated IP Cores
8. Appendices x
8.1. Appendix A: Parameterizable Pipeline Modules 8.2. Appendix B: Clock Enables and Resets
8.2. Appendix B: Clock Enables and Resets x
8.2.1. Synchronous Resets and Limitations 8.2.2. Retiming with Clock Enables 8.2.3. Resolving Short Paths
8.2.1. Synchronous Resets and Limitations x
8.2.1.1. Synchronous Resets Summary
8.2.2. Retiming with Clock Enables x
8.2.2.1. Example for Broadcast Control Signals
Answers to Top FAQs
1. Hyperflex® FPGA Architecture Introduction
2. Hyperflex® Architecture RTL Design Guidelines
3. Compiling Hyperflex® Architecture Designs
4. Design Example Walk-Through
5. Retiming Restrictions and Workarounds
6. Optimization Example
7. Hyperflex® Architecture Porting Guidelines
8. Appendices
9. Hyperflex® Architecture High-Performance Design Handbook Archive
10. Hyperflex® Architecture High-Performance Design Handbook Revision History

3. Compiling Hyperflex® Architecture Designs

The Quartus® Prime Pro Edition Compiler is optimized take full advantage of the Hyperflex® architecture. The Quartus® Prime Pro Edition Compiler supports the Hyper-Aware design flow, in which the Compiler automatically maximizes retiming of registers into Hyper-Registers.

Hyper-Aware Design Flow

Use the Hyper-Aware design flow to shorten design cycles and optimize performance. The Hyper-Aware design flow combines automated register retiming, with implementation of targeted timing closure recommendations (Fast Forward compilation), to maximize use of Hyper-Registers and drive the highest performance for Hyperflex® architecture FPGAs.

Figure 85. Hyper-Aware Design Flow

Register Retiming

A key innovation of the Hyperflex® architecture is the addition of multiple Hyper-Registers in routing segments and block inputs. Maximizing the use of Hyper-Registers improves design performance. The prevalence of Hyper-Registers improves balance of time delays between registers and mitigates critical path delays. The Compiler's Retime stage moves registers out of ALMs and retimes them into Hyper-Registers, wherever advantageous. Register retiming runs automatically during the Fitter, requires minimal effort, and can result in significant performance improvement. Following retiming, the Finalize stage corrects connections with hold violations.

Fast Forward Compilation

If you require optimization beyond simple register retiming, run Fast Forward compilation to generate timing closure recommendations that break key performance bottlenecks that prevent further movement into Hyper-Registers. For example, Fast Forward recommends removing specific retiming restrictions that prevent further retiming into Hyper-Registers. Fast Forward compilation shows precisely where to make the most impact with RTL changes, and reports the predictive performance benefits you can expect from removing restrictions and retiming into Hyper-Registers (Hyper-Retiming). The Fitter does not automatically retime registers across RAM and DSP blocks. However, Fast Forward analysis shows the potential performance benefit from this optimization.

Figure 86. Hyper-Register Architecture

Fast-Forward compilation identifies the best location to add pipeline stages (Hyper-Pipelining), and the expected performance benefit in each case. After you modify the RTL to place pipeline stages at the boundaries of each clock domain, the Retime stage automatically places the registers within the clock domain at the optimal locations to maximize performance. Implement the recommendations in RTL to achieve similar results. After implementing any changes, re-run the Retime stage until the results meet performance and timing requirements. Fast Forward compilation does not run automatically as part of a full compilation. Enable or run Fast Forward compilation in the Compilation Dashboard.

Table 7.  Optimization Steps
Optimization Step Technique Description
Step 1 Register Retiming The Retime stage performs register retiming and moves existing registers into Hyper-Registers to increase performance by removing retiming restrictions and eliminating critical paths.
Step 2 Fast Forward Compile Compiler generates design-specific timing closure recommendations and predicts performance improvement with removal of all barriers to Hyper-Registers (Hyper-Retiming).
Step 3 Hyper-Pipelining Use Fast Forward compilation to identify where to add new registers and pipeline stages in RTL.
Step 4 Hyper-Optimization Design optimization beyond Hyper-Retiming and Hyper-Pipelining, such as restructuring loops, removing control logic limits, and reducing the delay along long paths.

Verifying Design RTL

The Quartus® Prime software includes the Design Assistant design rule checking tool to verify the suitability to your design RTL for the Hyperflex® architecture. These rules include Hyper-Retimer Readiness Rules (HRR) that specifically target Hyperflex® FPGA architecture designs, as describes.


Section Content
Compiling Submodules Independently
Design Assistant Design Rule Checking

Level Two Title